God And Aliens

There was a fascinating news story this week about the Chief Astronomer of the Catholic Church (and who knew that they had such a position!) letting the faithful know that believing in aliens was okay. The story is more or less what one might expect, save for a flamboyant remark or two about “the alien is my brother.”

However, the story did bring up an area of study that I never thought I’d have occasion to revisit.

THE HEAVEN, THE EARTH, THE STARS

One fact, usually overlooked, is that the creation story of Genesis is almost entirely focused upon the earth, and ignores the rest of the universe.

Let’s start with “heaven.” Most people think of heaven as a supreme alternate universe - a perfect world. That idea, however, is entirely different that what the author of Genesis meant. The word originally meant, “the opening between the ground and the clouds.” Or, as we might say, “the atmosphere.” The reference is Genesis 1:6-8. If you have time, look up “firmament.” The Blue Letter Bible is a convenient tool for such things. (It was Plato, by the way - one of my least favorite philosophers - who popularized a more modern idea of heaven.)

So, even when Genesis says that God created the heaven and the earth, it is really only talking about the area within earth’s cloud cover.

The creation story of Genesis really says only two things about the universe beyond the clouds:

1. He made the sun and moon.

2. He made the stars also. (You can find this in Genesis 1:16)

WHAT THIS MEANS

This means that all of the Middle Ages stuff about the earth being the center of the universe and the sole focus of God’s attention rested on the flimsiest of scriptural foundations. In other words, those “Christian” beliefs had very little to do with the Christian book. (Not that many people read the book at that time.)

This also means that if you are considering Middle Ages insanities to be representative of Christianity, you are making an error. But, that’s a separate discussion.

WHAT ABOUT ALIENS?

First of all, the Bible really doesn’t say anything about them. I suppose that someone must interpret some Bible passage to refer to aliens, but that would be, in my opinion, a real stretch. The Bible just isn’t concerned with very much outside of this particular space rock.

There is no essential theological problem with the Creator making life on other planets. But, once people try to tie that concept to their particular doctrine of salvation, they come up against some real difficulties. And this applies to Protestants just as much as it does Catholics. (My background in Orthodox theology is a little thin, so I’ll pass on commentary there.)

Here are some particular problems:

Did their first person sin like Adam? This is the issue of Original Sin. (Another religious phrase not found in the Bible.) And if not, this opens up a fascinating field of study regarding Adam’s original state and what pre-fall humanity was like. (We did examine this in A Second Look At Eden.)

Did Jesus die for the aliens too, or only for men of earth? Do they need a different savior, or was ours effective for them too? The Bible calls Jesus “the only begotten,” which pretty well excludes another like him, so this question is big.

Are they “men”? The Bible says a lot about men, but does this term extend to alien beings? And if not, are there separate rules for them? (Presumably, any rules would be the same in essence as ours, being given by the same coherent, unchanging God.)

Are they made in the image of God? What if they look different than us? Does “the image of God” refer to appearance or to some other structure or set of characteristics? And do they necessarily have spirits and souls like we do?

Do they have their own hell or heaven? This is a tough one, and it is predicated upon some of our previous questions. Here’s one interesting fact: The aliens presumably wouldn’t even have to think about a hell if they had never fallen into sin.

Angels and demons? Some Christians think that aliens exist, and that they are either angels or demons. Certainly, that would be a problem for the Vatican’s Astronomer, especially if it meant he had called a demon his brother, but that doesn’t make the idea false. And… few know this, but the word “angel” simply means messenger; the word “demon” means “divider of spoils.” Supernatural characteristics related to both classes of beings do exist in the Bible, but not by definition.

Did the whole universe stand still on Joshua’s long day? Or was it just earth? Refer to the 10th chapter of Joshua (6th book of the Bible) if you don’t remember this story.

I’m sure there are many other questions that spin-off from this subject. But do notice that problems arise more from the doctrines of religions than from the text itself.

Once people feel they need to have an answer for everything, they tend to fill theological gaps with weak ideas, and to defend them all the more fiercely.

ACTUALLY…

Here’s a really interesting idea: If the aliens had never fallen into sin, then they’d probably want to avoid us like a plague. And this, of course, would explain why they never seem to drop in to say hi!

Maybe sinless aliens should be the subject of my next novel? :)

Recommend this article to: Digg Reddit Slashdot

Explore posts in the same categories: Theology

2 Comments on “God And Aliens”

  1. Sean Hastings Says:

    One of my favorite bits in the article was the quote “This is not in contrast with our faith because we can’t put limits on God’s creative freedom.”

    This is particularly interesting, when you consider that the history of church dogma has forever been one of limiting GOD. Everything they have ever declared to be a truth about the universe or suggested that human beings must do or not do because GOD would want it that way has been a limitation of what God can be.

    If the church really starts opening up to all the possibilities offered by a truly omnipotent creator, where would they stop?

    If the church becomes ok with the idea of GOD putting alien beings with intelligence on other worlds, why not then be open to the idea of other universes? An omnipotent and infinite GOD must have created infinite universes - including multiple versions of earth and the human race - multiple - even infinite - versions of every human being in existence.

    Would each earth have its own heaven, or could you expect multiple - even infinite - copies of you to make it into heaven. And of course, multiple - even infinite - copies of you in hell and purgatory too. All possible outcomes to all situations could, and therefore would exist, given an omnipotent creator. This makes any choice you make (to sin or not to sin) automatically moot. Given two choices, in infinite worlds you will choose one way and in infinite worlds you will also choose the other.

    I think it would be a lot safer for them not to go down this particular road, and try to ignore how big “all of creation” could really be, given a truly omnipotent creator. I don’t think the Pope will be giving aliens the thumbs up (at least not speaking ex-cathadra) anytime soon - or ever. If and when we discover evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence, it might be a different story, but I am sure it will be left alone until then.

  2. Ool Schreglmann Says:

    I think there is a real problem there, actually, what with so many people still living in this mythological world and totally ignoring outer space, treating it as something they don’t refuse to disbelieve in these days, as some of them still do in evolution, but the existence of which they consider inconsequential.

    In fact for many of them their idea of future history is that we’ll continue to live on this speck of dust until the End of the World (i.e. this planet happens) and the reign of “Heaven” starts under a totalitarian dictator of the Universe.

    But what is so tragic about this is that the existence of outer space is anything but inconsequential. It could be our way out of our present energy bottleneck. The Sun is half a degree wide in the sky. The Earth, being a hundredth of the Sun’s size, is consequently only a two hundredth of a degree wide in the sky from the distance of the Sun, translating to a puny two billionth of the entire area the Sun emits light at.

    That means there’s two billion times more solar energy out there than shines down on this planet. If only a fraction of that could be collected by solar power stations and beamed down to Earth as microwaves it would give us more energy than fossil fuels ever gave us. Forget about SUVs—we could all be driving tanks to work (if we like) from that. But not only that. We could desalinate and detoxify water and pump it wherever we need it. We could run heating and air conditioning in any weather and without feeling guilty about using up non-renewable resources or increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

    If we managed to build space elevators then not only could we beam down energy from space, we could do agriculture in geostationary orbit on a scale that would exceed the yield of crops on the surface by orders of magnitude. Eventually rotating space habitats could also give us hundreds of times more surface to live on than the crust of this planet ever provided us with. After all, life on this planet has been little more than mold on a wall since the dawn of time. Most of this planet’s space and resources are forever locked in its molten core, where they are of little use to us.

    So there is all this amazing future ahead of us, plenty of which achievable in our lifetimes if we went for it, and yet the religious (but also secular-thinking people) are simply blind to it. To them life on the surface of an Earth-like planet is all they can ever imagine, even in their science fiction. At their best they think about preserving the ecosphere and living sustainably and frugally, but they never think about becoming independent of such a fragile ecosystem as the one we’re presently dependent on.

    Can you imagine what a ring system of space elevators in geostationary orbit would look like and how much living space and energy it could provide us with? I can…

    http://www.ulrichschreglmann.homepage.t-online.de/tmp/ring.swf

    They can’t.

Comment: